Mike Kueber's Blog

June 28, 2011

Great presidents and continuing legal education

During the annual meeting of the State Bar of Texas, I had the good fortune of hearing presidential historian Douglas Brinkley give a talk on great presidents in America’s history.  I’m not sure how his talk qualified as continuing legal education for lawyers, but the state bar has almost unlimited power on that issue and it is very unlikely that anyone will complain.

Brinkley is a famous historian who is often interviewed on national news programs because he has the ability to present information in an interesting way, and his talk to at the annual meeting didn’t disappoint.  The talk was informal, and I suspect Brinkley could give it in his sleep.  His principal insights were:

  1. Although the talk was about presidents, Brinkley started with a non-president – Charles Thompson – who was a relatively unknown politician who did yeomen’s work in forming our union, but then was shut-out of a role in the newly-formed United States because he was too progressive for his time – i.e., he favored the emancipation of slaves and the liberation of women.
  2. George Washington’s signal achievement was to give up power after two terms.
  3. Thomas Jefferson saw that the Mississippi River was the spine of America and that religion has no place in a democracy.
  4. James Polk was successful because he established clear objectives (resolving the border issues with Mexico and Canada) and knew that wars of choice must be ended quickly.
  5. Lincoln’s challenges make the challenges faced by any other president seem highly manageable.
  6. Teddy Roosevelt created and led the conservation movement even though the public wasn’t demanding it.
  7. Franklin Roosevelt created the feeling that the federal government could solve all our problems.
  8. Harry Truman was horribly unpopular because he was too direct in trying to achieve his objectives, but his stock in history has skyrocketed.
  9. Dwight Eisenhower was an under-rated president who showed that America could be fiscally conservative and still do great things – e.g., NASA, interstate highways, and St. Lawrence Seaway.
  10. John Kennedy implemented things that worked (Peace Corp and SEALS/Green Beret), whereas his successor Lyndon Johnson spent too much money on things that didn’t work.
  11. Gerald Ford did a great job of extricating America from two problems – Nixon and Vietnam.
  12. Jimmy Carter brought morality to Washington.
  13. Ronald Reagan went with his gut and told Gorbachev to “tear down this wall.”
  14. Bill Clinton was relatively successful, but never did anything big and will always be remembered for the sex scandal.
  15. George H.W. Bush will be upgraded by historians because of his brilliant handling of foreign policy.
  16. Barack Obama is disposed to placate, not lead.  He acts like the only adult in the room, but doesn’t lead.  His greatest accomplishment will be getting elected.

Brinkley skipped over Bush-43, but someone during the Q&A asked if it was likely that Bush-43 would be upgraded by historians.  Brinkley did not think so because Bush-43 would be forever stained by the economic collapse at the end of his second term.  It’s ironic that Bush’s economic collapse not only resulted in the historic election of Barack Obama, but also may have fated Obama to the ignominy of a one-term presidency.

In my opinion, Brinkley skipping Bush-43 was bad enough, but skipping Richard Nixon, too, is unforgivable, especially when he found time to mention Jimmy Carter.  I will keep that in mind when reading Brinkley in the future.

November 30, 2010

Of the people, by the people, for the people

The cover story in Time magazine this week – titled “Time Frames” – reviews the first decade in the 21st century.  (The argument about whether the 21st century started in 2000 or 2001 is conveniently ignored.)  The lead story by David Von Drehle summarizes the decade by saying:

“Again and again, the system was tested and the system failed: 9/11, WMD, Katrina, subprime, BP…. [T]he lack of trust fosters a suspicion that we now have a government of the feckless, by the crooked, for the connected.”

As a discerning reader, I noticed Von Drehle’s play on words.  The famous expression is “government of the people, by the people, for the people.”  That expression is not a part of the U.S. Constitution or the Declaration of Independence; it was delivered in 1863 by Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address.  Lincoln apparently was inspired to draft this expression after reading a lecture by an abolitionist minister that read, “Democracy is direct self-government, over all the people, for all the people, by all the people.” 

According to Time magazine’s Von Drehle, American government is no longer “of” the people; rather it is “of” the feckless – i.e., incompetent, ineffective, irresponsible, lazy.  Sometime it seems that way. 

American government is no longer “by” the people; rather it is “by” the crooked – i.e., not straight, dishonest, immoral, or evasive.  Charlie Rangel?  Chris Dodd?  Rod Blagojevich?  Tom DeLay?  Need I go on? 

American government is no longer “for” the people; rather it is “for” the connected – i.e., having social and professional relationships, especially with influential and powerful persons.  Goldman Sachs?  AIG?  General Motors?

The Tea Party claims that it wants to “Take Our Country Back.”  But in order to do that, we the feckless (conservatives and liberals) need to quit electing crooks who cater to the connected.  We need to shun politicians who secure large campaign contributions and be wary of deep-pocket advocates.